Tripura: CPIM Questions Govt’s Handling of Insurgent Issues, TET Order and Administrative Decisions

No Comments
Posted in Featured, Northeast, Tripura
Abhijit Nath, NET Correspondent, Tripura

Agartala, June 12, 2026: CPIM Tripura State Secretary Jitendra Chaudhury on Friday criticised the BJP-led state government on multiple fronts, alleging failure to address issues concerning surrendered insurgent groups, safeguard teachers affected by a recent court ruling, and ensure transparency in governance.

Addressing a press conference in Agartala city, Chaudhury said the government’s approach towards the demands raised by groups identifying themselves as the NLFT and ATTF has not yielded any permanent solution. He alleged that repeated negotiations, assurances and rehabilitation packages announced over the years have failed to resolve the matter, resulting in recurring protests and blockades that disrupt normal life.

According to the CPIM leader, public inconvenience caused by road and rail blockades should not become a recurring feature of governance. He said the administration must take a clear and final stand on commitments made to such groups and ensure that ordinary citizens do not bear the burden of unresolved issues.

Chaudhury also expressed concern over the Supreme Court’s decision making the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) mandatory for non-TET teachers. He argued that teachers appointed before the introduction of the TET system should not be adversely affected by later policy changes. Pointing to vacancies in schools across the state, he urged the government to seek legal remedies, including a review petition before the apex court.

The CPIM leader further targeted TIPRA Motha and its founder, Pradyot Kishore Debbarma, alleging contradictions in the party’s political stance. He questioned claims of tribal development and raised concerns over the implementation of the Forest Rights Act and the pending 125th Constitutional Amendment Bill aimed at strengthening autonomous councils.

Chaudhury also criticised the continued reappointment of retired officials in key government positions. He alleged that prolonged extensions despite the availability of serving officers have generated dissatisfaction within administrative circles and called for greater accountability and transparency from the government.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
Are you human? Please solve:Captcha